Talk:Georgie Spinelli (Harper Rose Barash)/@comment-2220390-20130911190838/@comment-3418856-20130915055315

Technically, if her name is Constanza and they just call her Connie, you add II since she is the second, even if it's not "legally" part of her name. But, we don't know if her name is actually Constanza, but since there is already a Connie Falconeri, for the wiki's purposes it's the best way to go. As far as skipping generations or change in line (niece/cousin/etc. instead of daughter), you'd technically use II if it skips a generation or changes lines (opposed to using Jr., which is specifically for a child with the same name as their parent).

As far as Stone Cates, I think for the wiki's purposes, adding the II is necessary since there's already a Stone Cates. But, technically, he wouldn't be the second because the elder Stone is actually Michael, and they never said that the junior Stone is Michael. I've been meaning to make sure their pages are fixed accordingly.